hp
i heard 51-53

i heard 51-53
when i bought my ltr the sales man told me suzuki rated them at 43 hp stock. i laughed at him. lol
[/b]
Yeah, but honestly, who talks about hp at the crank?That # doesn't sound way off to me. In a magazine test I read a LTR was dynoed at roughly 44 HP. Of course we are talking about HP AT THE CLUTCH here.
[/b]
Yeah, but honestly, who talks about hp at the crank?
[/b]
So you guys pull the engines out and dyno them on a stand? Or do you just not dyno the bikes at all? The rwhp seems the easiest....Uhm, where I live that's the common way.
[/b]
So you guys pull the engines out and dyno them on a stand? Or do you just not dyno the bikes at all? The rwhp seems the easiest....
[/b]
The dyno is a tool period. When you mod a bike you need to look at what changed in the curve not what the peak number is. Dyno racing is pointless...but a dyno is an invaluable tool.its just my opinion but i think dyno #'s and hp are stupid. its tells you nothing. every dyno reads a different number. no 2 are the same. i know guys who spent $20,000 on profesional motor and almost cried when they ran it on the dyno because the numbers were low. but when they took it to another they got a reading that was 200hp higher. all a dyno is good for is tuning you motor. so what im sayin its kinda pointless to go braggin that ur hp #'s are better than every one elses. the real test is on the track or where ever you ride or play. im not bashing any one its just my opion on dyno's and people who brag about there hp.
[/b]
Amen,The proofs in the pudding
[/b]
Its funny whene the person that started this topic hasnt been on the sight for over a year
[/b]